Svenska English

Close
Integrationsforum

Intresserad av föreläsningar om integration, multikulturalism och invandring?


Jag sätter pennan – eller tangentbordet – åt sidan och tar istället upp mikrofonen.

Hos dig.

Det vill säga hos statliga verk, statliga/regionala/lokala myndigheter, företag, föreningar, skolor, religiösa samfund.

Hälsningar
Ilya

Klicka här för att veta mer.

söndag 28 mars 2010

Peace in our time

Finally, peace is in the offing in the Middle East.

And it’s all thanks to Barack Hussein Obama. The man who took the presidency of the United States and turned it into an agency of the AIF.

The AIF? That’s right. The Arab Intransigence Front.

Did I say “peace”? Sorry, I meant “change”.

The AIF consists of Libya and Syria, whose whose chain is yanked by Iran, while the Palestinian Arabs, for the first time since they started massacring Jews back in the 1920s, are finally able to relax and let their allies in Teheran and Washington take the strain.

Make no mistake: the Washington-Teheran-Damascus-Ramallah axis is out to create history. Arab moderation such as it existed in the reign of rulers like Egypt’s President Sadat and Jordan’s King Hussein is finished, what is emerging is the inexorable onward crush of fanatical despotism as dictated by the likes of Moammar Gaddafi (read also this piece on the Libyan dictator), Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Bashar Assad, Khaled Meshaal, Mahmoud Abbas and Hassan Nasrallah.

Obama won a landmark victory at home with his health-care reforms. Desperate to prove that his domestic success was no flash-in-the-pan proof of mere domestic prowess but that he really is big enough for his overseas boots too, he has carefully tested the wind, abandoned his country’s support for democracy and realigned the United States with whoever can make him look powerful, purposeful, decisive. In short, whoever can make him look like a winner.

Which by definition means the Jews pay.

Read below under “Related Links” what Hussein Obama is doing to create and support a new intransigent Arab Middle East, how he is planning to shelve Israel and how disrespectfully he is treating America’s foremost ally. Britain routinely executes alleged militants abroad in extrajudicial killings and even fights wars in areas as far apart as Iraq, Argentina and Afghanistan while continuing to occupy Gibraltar and the Falkland Islands. Nevertheless, Britain has taken its cue from its master, the Obama-led regime in Washington and in an unprecedented show of animosity has expelled an Israeli diplomat on account of unfounded allegations of Israeli complicity in the murder of a wanted terrorist in Dubai.

Britain’s extraordinarily duplicitous stance on the issue of targeted killings and the USA’s extraordinarily aggressive actions against its sole ally in the Middle East, Israel, are going to have far-reaching and long-lasting repercussions.

Israel may have been selected as the whipping-boy in Obama’s frenzied ego-trip, but it is a fact well known that when one has one’s back to the wall, the only alternative to voluntarily giving up one’s life is to come out fighting.

History has taught us that when pressed, Israel will come out fighting savagely.

The question is which regimes will be in power in Washington, Teheran, Damascus and Ramallah to pick up the pieces. Because just as Obama’s and Brown’s self-assigned policing activities in Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia and Yemen result in alarming civilian casualties well beyond US and UK borders, so too do Israel’s US- and UK-enforced policing activities on its own doorstep look likely to result in large-scale casualties well beyond Israel’s borders.

Obama may want to look beyond his own reflection just long enough to consider what he is unleashing on countless people throughout the Middle East.

He’s certainly going to go down in history as a president to remember.

The question is, will he be remembered as a bumbling idiot or a man smart enough to realize his own limitations and take the advice of his betters.

 
Related links:
Zvi Mazel - The decline of the West
David Harris - Letter to Baroness Ashton - How do you write about Gaza without mentioning Hamas even once?
Morton A. Klein - Obama demonstrates his animosity towards Israel
Cal Thomas: America - Israel's new enemy?
Charles Hawley - Is Europe Islam's weakest victim? Article about Switzerland's ban on minaret construction
Elliot Abrams - The future of an illusion
Jonathan Spyer - Re-packaging illusion
Daniel Gordis - Will Obama ignite the third intifada?
 
 
Related links from this site:
Obama's intifada
The EU goes to school - and learns nothing
A composite view of the Middle East
Ban Ki-moon's strange selective silence
Brazening it out
Silence and condemnation
Strange priorities
 

Etiketter: , , , , , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share
upplagd av Ilya Meyer

torsdag 24 september 2009

The UN is dead. Announcing the birth of FREE

Muammar Gaddafi of Libya is right.

And so too is Mahmud Ahmadinejad of Iran.

They both want the UN to be fundamentally restructured.

They both accuse the UN’s various key organisations of partisanship. Of failing to deal even-handedly. Of taking sides. Of gross disregard of certain member states.

They want to see certain member states excluded from the UN’s various bodies.

And they have a point. A very valid point.

It really is time to create an organisation that truly represents the entire world.

Not just the bully-boys in the Islamic sphere and their fanatical collaborators.

Imagine a UN in which discussion is encouraged. Where debate aims at resolving problems. Where funds are used to solve the root cause of problems, instead of perpetuating them. Where problems are tackled with honesty and straight talk, backed up by firm action.

Gaddafi and Ahmadinejad, those paragons of democracy, free speech and peace, are absolutely right.

It really IS time to restructure the UN.

There should be two UNs. One consisting of large swathes of the Arab and Muslim worlds, allied to such beacons of freedom and democracy as Zimbabwe, Sudan and Cuba.

And the other consisting of the free world.

Leaving them free to pursue their goals.

And allowing us to make improvements in the free world.

Because if you want to find out what the world really looks like today while it is under siege at the UN, look no further than UN Watch.

Here are two short films.



That was then.

This is now.



Unfortunately, the films require no explanation.

And that’s the really sad part of it: the situation is plain for us to see, we keep paying to maintain the status quo, and there’s no change in sight.

I say vote for Gaddafi and Ahmadinejad and their proposal – a new, restructured “United Nations” or UN.

They can have it. These nations are, after all, truly united in their goals.

We’ll call our organisation the “Federation that Recognises and Embraces Equality”. FREE for short.

The only problem is, it feels truly terrible to condemn millions upon millions of ordinary, peace-loving citizens of the old UN to a life of misery under the new UN. A life with no prospect of any improvement.

UN Watch, Haaretz, JPost, Guardian, Guardian2, The Independent, The Daily Mail, WN, CBC, SwissInfo, RFE/RL, The Age, Brisbane Times, Washington Times, Tundra Tabloids, Gloria/Barry Rubin, Melanie Phillips, Melanie Phillips2, Ilya Meyer/UN Human Rights Council, Ilya Meyer, Ilya Meyer2, Ilya Meyer3,

Etiketter: , , , , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share
upplagd av Ilya Meyer